Cybercare is Malaysia’s only end-to-end cyber resilience programme — built to close the governance gap
between boardroom accountability and operational readiness, when it matters most.
Most organisations invest in cybersecurity tools and technical teams. Very few have ensured that their board can govern, decide, and communicate with authority when an incident occurs. Cybercare addresses that gap.
Organisations that cannot translate cyber incidents into financial, operational, and reputational impact — in the boardroom — cannot demonstrate readiness to auditors, insurers, or regulators. Every ringgit spent on technology carries unquantified residual risk until the board can read the dashboard that governs it.
When the board lacks the vocabulary to challenge management’s cyber assumptions, critical decisions are delayed during incidents. Threat windows widen. SOC capability becomes strategically handicapped. Without board-level governance literacy, your technical investment operates at a fraction of its potential.
A breach that reaches the press before your board has a coordinated incident response protocol will define your organisation for years — in the eyes of regulators, shareholders, and the public. The question is not whether a cyber incident will occur. It is whether your leadership is prepared to lead through it.
15 Days (3 progressive weeks) · SOC Analysts · Security Teams · Delivered at Axiata Cyber Fusion Centre
A comprehensive, practitioner-led programme that takes participants from foundational SOC concepts to leadership-grade operational capability — across every tier from L1 analyst to SOC Manager. The programme is structured in three progressive parts, each building on the last, and culminates in a full end-to-end incident simulation.
Designed for organisations building or maturing internal SOC capability. The outcome is not a team that monitors threats — it is a team that detects, contains, escalates, and communicates at board speed.
3 Days · Board Members · CEOs · Audit & Risk Committees · Kuala Lumpur
This is not a technical course. It is a structured governance engagement that places board members and senior leaders in the exact conditions they will face during a cyber incident — and equips them with the language, judgement, and decision protocols to lead with confidence.
Delivered across three progressive days, each building on the last. Participants complete a formal assessment. Successful completion constitutes documented evidence of board-level cyber governance competence.
Cybercare does not teach cybersecurity to your technical team. We build the governance intelligence, decision-making capability, and operational readiness that enables your entire leadership — from board to SOC — to act as one when a crisis occurs.
NIST and ISO-aligned assessments of your board’s cyber governance maturity, SOC capability gaps, and organisational risk posture. Board maturity diagnostics and strategic roadmap.
Bespoke Board Cyber Resilience Masterclass for leadership. SOC End-to-End Masterclass for operational teams. Both delivered by practitioners, not academics.
Structured development of your board-level incident response protocol, internal SOC playbooks, and governance documentation aligned to regulatory requirements.
Real-world crisis exercises that test your board’s governance decision-making and your SOC’s operational response simultaneously — inside Axiata’s live Cyber Fusion Centre.
Ongoing advisory, quarterly threat intelligence briefings, and governance review cycles aligned to your board’s risk calendar and regulatory reporting obligations.
The individuals who approve cyber risk appetite, face regulatory scrutiny, and must make high-stakes decisions with financial, legal, and reputational consequences — often with incomplete information and no time to consult.
The technology executives who must translate threat intelligence into board language, secure governance support for cyber investment, and ensure their SOC team operates with clarity of mandate when an incident occurs.
Organisations with public accountability, regulatory obligations, and reputational exposure. Those building internal SOC capability and cyber leadership pipelines that align operational defence with board-level governance.
A board that speaks the language of cyber risk with authority. A SOC that operates with executive clarity and escalates at board speed. An organisation that regulatory bodies, insurers, and shareholders can trust — with documentation to prove it.
Documented board-level cyber governance competence — certificated and auditable
Regulatory alignment: Bursa Malaysia CG Code 2021, BNM Risk Governance, NACSA NCSP
A single governance language shared between the board and the technical team
SOC operational capability benchmarked to NIST and ISO/IEC 27001
Before Cybercare, our board could not articulate our cyber risk exposure in the annual report with genuine confidence. The programme fundamentally changed how our directors engage with the CISO — and how we exercise governance accountability when decisions must be made under pressure.
The Board Cyber Resilience Masterclass gave our audit committee exactly what it needed not technical knowledge, but the governance vocabulary and decision framework to challenge management’s assumptions and lead during a crisis. The integrated scenario on Day 3 was confronting, precise, and invaluable.
The simulated crisis exercise exposed weaknesses in our escalation process that we had never identified internally. What impressed us most was how Cybercare challenged the board and executive team to make high-pressure decisions together, exactly as it would happen in reality. That experience alone was worth the investment.
As CISO, my greatest challenge was always translating cyber risk into business language that the board would act on. After Cybercare, the conversation changed permanently — faster governance decisions, stronger mandate, and a board that now asks the right questions instead of the wrong ones.
Most cybersecurity workshops overwhelm boards with technical language. Cybercare did the opposite — it simplified complexity into strategic decision-making. Our directors left with practical confidence, sharper oversight capabilities, and a much clearer understanding of their fiduciary responsibilities during a cyber crisis.
Programme participation constitutes documentable evidence of board-level cyber governance due diligence — recognised by auditors, corporate insurers, and regulatory bodies in Malaysia.
Board cyber competence aligned to Principle C, Practice 7.3 — board oversight of material risks including technology and cybersecurity
Technology risk oversight requirements for financial institutions — board accountability for information security governance
Critical national information infrastructure protection — organisational readiness and board-level governance standards
International standard for governance and operational benchmarking — Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover
International standard for governance and operational benchmarking — Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover